« DRCONGO : Democracy is commonly defined as the power of the people, by the people and for the people. For the people exercise power, throughout history, various mechanisms have been developed, in terms of different types or variants of democracy. Today, we resign ourselves to representative democracy, semi-direct or indirect through which the universal, direct or indirect, is realized for obtaining the representatives or delegates of the people in power. Various other mechanisms such as the plebiscite, the referendum, petitions, etc. are all popular and democratic expressions used for the triumph of popular will. Today, the democratic ideal is defined via the three conditions namely: 1.L'élection executive by universal suffrage (notice that there are two kinds, direct and indirect, and neither one here nor the other is imposed or the choice of one and the other does not hit the democratic spirit) »

" Democracy is defined as the dictatorship of the majority. Pass in a presidential election, the one that got the simple or absolute majority according to the Constitutions. In all democratic societies, the will of the majority always trumps the of the minority. So he always suits to constitute a majority to impose its will. Although in a democratic assembly, obstructionism is the strategy of a minority to thwart the majority, the Congolese opposition has minorised develop strategies to defeat the majority. the intox, deceptions, fallacies, the demonization of the current all-out power Congolese who has a comfortable parliamentary majority must admit that the opposition has been successful because it managed to create serious problems in power struggling to resort to democratic principles to get some things. But the opposition could she get there without the Western coaching?The decision or the law is good or bad, if the majority adopts it or does prevail, it can happen.What is required of the majority, is to ensure that the law or the decision it wants to convey is beneficial for the whole nation.The minority must accept this democratic principle, and find other ways to get his will, if satisfied that it is she who is right, by virtue of orthodoxy or science.The minority opposition in the DRC has used the rescue to unbalance western power and induce vomiting by the people, by demonizing it on the line.As the opposition wants to replace the current system, it shows the people that everything that the current government is against its head, his peace or progress of the DRC.Democracy, the rule of the majority.Referendum: Democracy in the DRC should be defined according to the subject of the opponents.Moreover, it is humans that inhabit the companies in order to determine the societal and social facts which one is right.Standards established by the law essentially experiencing a spatiotemporal evolution according to the will of humans.So if a good fraction of the Congolese people want one thing and the other Congolese reject it, the trick is to decide between the referendum.Nobody, democratically and constitutionally, the right to prevent or demonize those who may want to initiate.It is at the same time democratic and constitutional.The Constitution simply repeated in special issues, democratic principle.If the referendum is both constitutional and democratic, why the opposition disagrees she against him?That's because she knows that the referendum can blow the lock limiting the number of presidential terms established by Article 220 of the Constitution and it is seen losing presidential face Joseph Kabila.If the opposition was sure to beat Joseph Kabila even if it represented, it does not at this point would stir the sky for us to stick to the strict compliance with Article 220. Although copyright and Analysts also evoke imperialist reasons to explain the impatience of the Congolese opponents coached by the West to oust President Joseph Kabila of the DRC.Westerners, on the approach of those, want to head DRC someone they can control 100% and that is not going to turn to China, the worst enemy of Westerners in commercial matters and economic times go by.The Congolese opposition is aware of the fact that it is a minority Parliament where developing laws governing pays.Elle believes he has a popular majority, a belief that no one can prove beyond organizing a vote or referendum.Just as well then that the opposition understands that this or that approach.Dialogue and consensus: The dialogue has the advantage of having policies to raise consensus on matters where they do not agree remotely.Sometimes, as we can see in the history of the DRC, the country that the texts be revised or they are replaced by other squarely under the agreement.Is the dialogue objectionable so far?Should we define the situation in the DRC based on that of others?If some positions held by Congolese political coming of themselves and not VOR and notorious imperialists, we understand that there is no consensus on some sensitive political matter.But if the decision of some political position is due to the interference of the West to its interests, it is necessary to reclassify the assessments.In case of disagreement on a particular subject, we should not, as democratically as the world decide between one and the other on political theater in the referendum?"